My question about what attracts people to pick up certain books at the bookstore generated four answers about covers - five, if you count my own. Which is interesting, in that no one mentioned store placement, ads in magazines, author websites, or any other promotional means of selling a book.
I do have to admit that the power of a good cover works wonders in engaging my interest. Covers depicting anything historical are always sure to snag my attention, and I'm on 'em like a duck on a June bug. Artwork done well will let me know right off the bat what the time period is, and even the setting. I'll pick up the book, scan the back cover blurb, and then read the first page. Usually I'll also flip through to get more idea of the author's style, if it's someone I haven't read before. So while I don't base the purchase on the cover alone, it is what initially grabs me.
The covers of the Twilight series are a prime example of artwork that seizes your attention. With those dramatic red and white designs on a black background, you know you're in for an emotionally gripping read. Nothing misleading there.
Let's face it, we're a visual society. Whether right or wrong, we judge everything by appearances, at least initially. It's just a natural inclination. So getting a book cover right is extremely important, in my humble opinion, to the success of the book.
Sometimes, though, mistakes are made. One really common complaint among authors (it's surprising how common), is heroines depicted with the wrong color hair. I hear this all the time. Another is heroes who just don't resemble their physical description in the story at all. Obviously, the art department didn't bother reading the descriptions, but what's a reader's response to something like that? Does it drive you nuts enough to make you put down the book? Send an email to the publisher? My friend's mother would.
Cover styles come and go, but once a fad takes hold suddenly all the books on the shelves seem suspiciously similar, right down to the basic color scheme. That's the publishers all trying to cash in on what they believe will entice people to shell out bucks.
Right now we seem to be in a cycle of sexier, darker, more dramatic covers, as opposed to several years ago when flowery cover designs and even cartoonish artwork were more the thing. Back in the nineties, every historical romance had a clinch cover (with chesty heroes and half naked heroines practically kneeling at their feet) even if the story wasn't all that explicit. Do romance readers like sexy covers? Hate them? Or secretly like them, but don't necessarily want to be seen reading them?
What are your pet peeves when it comes to covers? Anything you'd like to see more of? Less of?